Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-24-2026
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the immediate functional impact of wearing ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) designed using the Optimal Segment Kinematics and Alignment approach to Rehabilitation (OSKAR method) versus wearing standard ankle foot orthosis (AFO)-footwear in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
Methods
Ten participants, ages seven to 13 years, from local pediatric clinics in a large suburban area participated in the study. Each participant wore both types of orthoses in a randomized order. This was determined by participants choosing a sealed envelope containing a sticker indicating which orthosis to be worn for the first data collection. Participants were assessed using three functional outcome measures: 1) the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), 2) Standardized Walking Obstacle Course, and 3) the Six-Minute Walk Test. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare outcome scores between the two conditions.
Results
Total scores on the PBS were significantly higher when wearing the OSKAR AFO-footwear combinations (AFOFCs) (median = 47.00), T = 26.50, p = 0.034, r = 0.95, but all other immediate functional scores were comparable between conditions.
Conclusions
AFOFCs designed using the OSKAR method may improve functional balance and should be considered when determining the orthotic prescription. These exploratory findings emphasize the need for further investigation of the effectiveness of OSKAR AFOFCs in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP).
Publication Title
Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine
PubMed ID
42029660
Recommended Citation
Pierce, Teresa; Fiss, Alyssa LaForme; Geil, Mark; and Barner, Karl, "Impact of optimized AFOs on functional outcomes in children with spastic cerebral palsy." (2026). PCOM Scholarly Works. 2373.
https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/scholarly_papers/2373
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18758894261439984
Comments
This article was published in Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/18758894261439984.
Copyright © 2026 The Authors. CC BY-NC 4.0.