Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.

METHOD: Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.

RESULTS: Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).

CONCLUSIONS: Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.

Publication Title

PLoS One

Volume

19

Issue

12

PubMed ID

39705239

Comments

This article was published in PLoS One, Volume 19, Issue 12.

The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312454.

Copyright © 2024 Bonacquisti et al. CC BY 4.0.

COinS