Location
Philadelphia, PA
Start Date
10-5-2021 12:00 AM
End Date
13-5-2021 12:00 AM
Description
Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in the United States. Evidence suggests that certified stroke centers have improved patient outcomes relative to non-certified hospitals. Our study explains the process, associated cost, quality and geographic proclivities of different certifying organizations.
Methods: Data was collected from published literature, information on certifying organizations’ websites and through direct communication with representatives of The Joint Commission (TJC), Det Norske Veritas and Germanischer Lloyd (DNV-GL), and Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP). Geographic mapping of thrombectomy capable centers and comprehensive stroke centers was performed with the ArcGIS online tool.
Results: Among the three certifying organizations, standards for recognition as acute, primary, thrombectomy capable and comprehensive stroke centers are not standardized. At the time of this review, there were 1406 TJC-certified stroke centers, 241 DNV-GL certified stroke centers and 66 HFAP-certified stroke centers in the United States. Cost for certification was similar with price scaled by complexity of capabilities. Quality metrics revealed a significantly higher rate of tPA administration and shorter door-to-needle time for TJC and DNV-GL centers than HFAP. All primary stroke centers exhibited improved in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality when compared to non-stroke centers.
Discussion: Despite lack of standardization of criteria between organizations, certification provides a mechanism for ensuring hospitals deliver higher standards of stroke care. Understanding variations in quality and scope of different organizations enables targeting of at-risk regions to maximize access and availability of care.
Embargo Period
6-4-2021
Stroke Centers of Excellence in the United States: Certification, Access and Outcomes
Philadelphia, PA
Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in the United States. Evidence suggests that certified stroke centers have improved patient outcomes relative to non-certified hospitals. Our study explains the process, associated cost, quality and geographic proclivities of different certifying organizations.
Methods: Data was collected from published literature, information on certifying organizations’ websites and through direct communication with representatives of The Joint Commission (TJC), Det Norske Veritas and Germanischer Lloyd (DNV-GL), and Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP). Geographic mapping of thrombectomy capable centers and comprehensive stroke centers was performed with the ArcGIS online tool.
Results: Among the three certifying organizations, standards for recognition as acute, primary, thrombectomy capable and comprehensive stroke centers are not standardized. At the time of this review, there were 1406 TJC-certified stroke centers, 241 DNV-GL certified stroke centers and 66 HFAP-certified stroke centers in the United States. Cost for certification was similar with price scaled by complexity of capabilities. Quality metrics revealed a significantly higher rate of tPA administration and shorter door-to-needle time for TJC and DNV-GL centers than HFAP. All primary stroke centers exhibited improved in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality when compared to non-stroke centers.
Discussion: Despite lack of standardization of criteria between organizations, certification provides a mechanism for ensuring hospitals deliver higher standards of stroke care. Understanding variations in quality and scope of different organizations enables targeting of at-risk regions to maximize access and availability of care.