The Effects of Modulating eNOS Activity and Coupling in Ischemia/Reperfusion (I/R)

Document Type


Publication Date



The in vivo role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) uncoupling mediating oxidative stress in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury has not been well established. In vitro, eNOS coupling refers to the reduction of molecular oxygen to L-arginine oxidation and generation of L-citrulline and nitric oxide NO synthesis in the presence of an essential cofactor, tetrahydrobiopterin (BH(4)). Whereas uncoupled eNOS refers to that the electron transfer becomes uncoupled to L-arginine oxidation and superoxide is generated when the dihydrobiopterin (BH(2)) to BH(4) ratio is increased. Superoxide is subsequently converted to hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). We tested the hypothesis that promoting eNOS coupling or attenuating uncoupling after I/R would decrease H(2)O(2)/increase NO release in blood and restore postreperfused cardiac function. We combined BH(4) or BH(2) with eNOS activity enhancer, protein kinase C epsilon (PKC ε) activator, or eNOS activity reducer, PKC ε inhibitor, in isolated rat hearts (ex vivo) and femoral arteries/veins (in vivo) subjected to I(20 min)/R(45 min). When given during reperfusion, PKC ε activator combined with BH(4), not BH(2), significantly restored postreperfused cardiac function and decreased leukocyte infiltration (p < 0.01) while increasing NO (p < 0.05) and reducing H(2)O(2) (p < 0.01) release in femoral I/R veins. These results provide indirect evidence suggesting that PKC ε activator combined with BH(4) enhances coupled eNOS activity, whereas it enhanced uncoupled eNOS activity when combined with BH(2). By contrast, the cardioprotective and anti-oxidative effects of the PKC ε inhibitor were unaffected by BH(4) or BH(2) suggesting that inhibition of eNOS uncoupling during reperfusion following sustained ischemia may be an important mechanism.

Publication Title

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology





First Page


Last Page


PubMed ID



This article was published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology,Volume 385, Issue 1, January 2012, pages 27-38.

The published version is available at

Copyright © 2011 Springer-Verlag

This document is currently not available here.