Location

Philadelphia, PA

Start Date

10-5-2021 12:00 AM

End Date

13-5-2021 12:00 AM

Description

Objectives: The authors review the literature to compare biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine as determined by cadaveric and finite elemental model (FEM) studies, with commercially available three-dimensional (3D) printing materials to aid in the development of 3D-printed cervical spines that can be used as biomechanically accurate educational tools. Specifically, 3D printing materials for fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers were explored.

Methods: A literature review of biomechanical specifications such as Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s ratio of certain anatomical aspects of the cervical spine was performed by searching the databases PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Wolters Kluwer, ClinicalKey, and EMBASE via Elsevier for keywords. The anatomical features that were investigated included cortical and cancellous bone, facet joints, intervertebral discs, and ligaments. Additionally, datasheets from companies Stratasys, Fillamentum, NinjaTek, SD3D, Polymakers, Lubrizol and BASF were compiled to review the specifications and mechanical properties of their 3D printing materials.

Results: Suggested FDM 3D printing materials were assigned to anatomical features of the cervical spine according to their respective biomechanical properties, namely: cortical and cancellous bone, facet joint articular cartilage and the synovial membrane, both the ground substance and fibers of the annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, ligamenta flava, interspinous ligaments, and capsular ligaments.

Conclusions: FDM 3D printing can improve development of cervical spine models for educational use and surgical case preparation. Commercially available materials and techniques exist to simulate all of the major anatomical components of the cervical spine.

Embargo Period

6-4-2021

COinS
 
May 10th, 12:00 AM May 13th, 12:00 AM

A Review of Applicable Materials for 3D Printing a Biomechanically Accurate Cervical Spine Model for Surgical Education & Case Preparation

Philadelphia, PA

Objectives: The authors review the literature to compare biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine as determined by cadaveric and finite elemental model (FEM) studies, with commercially available three-dimensional (3D) printing materials to aid in the development of 3D-printed cervical spines that can be used as biomechanically accurate educational tools. Specifically, 3D printing materials for fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers were explored.

Methods: A literature review of biomechanical specifications such as Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s ratio of certain anatomical aspects of the cervical spine was performed by searching the databases PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Wolters Kluwer, ClinicalKey, and EMBASE via Elsevier for keywords. The anatomical features that were investigated included cortical and cancellous bone, facet joints, intervertebral discs, and ligaments. Additionally, datasheets from companies Stratasys, Fillamentum, NinjaTek, SD3D, Polymakers, Lubrizol and BASF were compiled to review the specifications and mechanical properties of their 3D printing materials.

Results: Suggested FDM 3D printing materials were assigned to anatomical features of the cervical spine according to their respective biomechanical properties, namely: cortical and cancellous bone, facet joint articular cartilage and the synovial membrane, both the ground substance and fibers of the annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, ligamenta flava, interspinous ligaments, and capsular ligaments.

Conclusions: FDM 3D printing can improve development of cervical spine models for educational use and surgical case preparation. Commercially available materials and techniques exist to simulate all of the major anatomical components of the cervical spine.